Saturday, 14 September 2019

Helping young people to write the story of themselves


I’ll confess. I found the first Future Leaders summer residential really tough. There were some really bloomin’ clever people who I didn’t always agree with and bag-loads of self-reflection (which for an over-thinker like myself has the tendency to make me somewhat morose). Perhaps made more acute because I was knackered at the end of the academic year, I found it a challenge both mentally and emotionally.

It’s taken a good eight weeks to digest and consolidate, and several drafts of this rather rubbish blog, but what has come out of it, more positively, is the crystallisation of what I value in schools and the values I will live when, one day, I become a Head.

It was the second day. We’d been given a bank of the kind of terms you see plastered over school letterheads – Aspiration. Learning. Achievement. Kindness. Fairness. – and asked to highlight our values. The ones we’d hang our hat on. The ones that would be the core drivers in our future schools.

None were quite doing the job. There was a niggling internal voice of disquiet at the genericism being being presented to us. And then I saw it: pride.

I’d discounted it at first. Initially, it spoke of Othello-like hubris. Of arrogance. Of some of the more bullish behaviours demonstrated by one or two participants on the course itself. But then slowly it shifted in my mind into rainbow celebrations. Mining strikes. Pupils clutching GCSE certificates.

What I want for every child, adult, and community I work for is a secure belief in who they are, pride in the many places they have come from, and the amazing possibilities they are heading to. I want to help grow bravery and self-confidence in a world where tone policing is still rife if you are female, BAME or LGBTQ so that individuals and groups can own the achievements they have worked for.

The word reminded me of the brilliant Jaz Ampaw-Farr speaking at the PiXL main meeting this June. She ended by stating with absolute certainty: ‘I am powerful because I know my own value’.

Hers is self-assuredness that hasn’t come from mimicking public school behaviours or being given access to a rowing club. Or even donning a blazer. It’s a deep sense of self-worth that stems from ownership of her own personal story. She is the Delphic maxim ‘Know thyself’ brought to life.

‘Knowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom’
-       inscribed at Temple of Apollo at Delphi and attributed to Socrates 

So, to begin to feel such pride you have to first fashion together a coherent sense of your own identity and I for one – despite my pretty linear personal history – will never underestimate how difficult this can be.

In ‘The Colossus’, Plath says “I shall never get you put together entirely,/Pieced, glued, and properly jointed.” As a teenager I misread this line, seeing it as Plath musing on her own sense of self rather than her perceptions of her father. Even now, it perfectly sums up to me the confusion that stems from the seemingly simple concept of ‘who you are’. My undergraduate dissertation was rather pompously titled ‘The subject always asks ‘What am I?’ after a line in a Helene Cixous text and I reckon I’m still asking that question at the ripe old age of thirty-five.

But what if your experiences and background aren’t linear? What if your experiences of the world are complex, fractured, multifarious? How then do you make sense of the jumbling pieces of yourself in order to craft something coherent?

I am lucky enough to teach both pupils who grew up on different continents, who have lived in many different contexts, and who speak several languages as well as, conversely, pupils whose roots and experiences are encapsulated by the couple of mile square catchment of our school. As such, many of our pupils are members of groups with values very different from the wider culture they now find themselves part of. It is our duty to show these young people that these rich personal identities have the power to become their greatest asset and strength.

As educators, our school culture, our curriculum and the pastoral support we give has the power to help pupils stitch together what can appear disparate facets of their lives and experiences. We can do this by filling in knowledge gaps related to geography and history. We can do this by shining a light on the structures of power and class they find themselves in. We can physically bring together the home and school as well as taking pupils out into the wider world to let them see it all for themselves. We can do this by telling them stories which will enable them to grow into adults who are able to confidently write and tell the story of themselves.

Later on Twitter, Jaz rightly proposed “We can define our own identity but belonging requires agreement from the group.” Schools are surely one of the most powerful of all groups you can join. As a Head, I want to create a school culture in which every single child, teacher, parent, and community member feels powerfully that they belong. Daniel Pink says that “when people join groups where change seems possible, the potential for that change to occur becomes more real.” And I really do believe that through the schools we create we can positively change lives.

So, with just a couple of weeks to go until the next Future Leaders residential, I am feeling less knackered, more optimistic, and well up for the next challenge. And when I get asked the question about my values again I won’t need to look down at the list of words on the paper in front of me. I’ll be able to answer with my head held high: pride.

Sunday, 2 June 2019

'It is with regret that I am resigning as Regional Adviser for LitDrive'


Five years ago, the marvellous online community that is Team English came into being, sustained first by the hashtag, then by the @Team_English1 account run selflessly by Nikki and Becky, and most recently grown by the meet-ups and national conferences. The kindness, discussion and professional challenge that goes on in our little corner of edu-Twitter has been a source of inspiration and support for literally thousands of English teachers both at home and overseas.

Fundamental to this network has been free sharing for the good of all whether that be ideas, expertise, time or resources. As many of us have found again and again, what you give you receive back in abundance.

We have Dropboxed schemes of work. We have emailed PowerPoints. We have posted whole boxes of set texts we no longer need. We have listened to one another’s concerns. We have improved resources and sent back the second version. We have traded thoughts. We have proofread. We have offered advice. We have built on ideas. We have developed trust and very real friendships.

I firmly believe that the moment you monetise that collaboration – no matter how nominal the amount or the reasons behind it – one of our core values is lost.

It is therefore with real sadness that I have heard LitDrive is planning to introduce a fee for its use.

The resources uploaded to date and the teachers who have committed themselves as unpaid Regional Advisors have done so on the premise that this a free hosting platform set up for the good of all in Team English. Now those teachers are left with the decision whether to pull their resources and support from the site or accept that those who want to access them will be charged.

I fully appreciate the emotional and financial investment Kat has made in Litdrive. Her drive and determination to make it a success is impressive and the purpose of this blog is certainly not to cause upset. However, having raised my concerns privately over many months I think it is right to provide a counterpoint to her own blog and messages on the subject.

Susan Strachan @SusanSEnglish has shared with me the email she has sent to resign her position with LitDrive. I am posting it here with her permission.

Dear Kat & LitDrive Team, 

It is with regret that I am resigning as Regional Adviser for LitDrive. I have many reasons for making this decision, which I will outline below and I wish you well with LitDrive, but feel I cannot in good conscience continue as a representative of the organisation. 

The first and probably most important reason is that the core value of being a free at point of access resource bank for teachers to help and share in workload has changed and while I agree that £5 per member is a nominal fee, the hundreds of teachers who spend hours and hours on creating resources and sharing them, currently do so for free and have been able to do this successfully without having a site that charges for the hosting of their* resources.

I fundamentally disagree with teachers paying for resources and, while I understand you are encouraging this payment as a fee that departments pay, a majority of the funds will be from teachers’ own pockets. This goes against my principles and the reasons that I have for sharing. While, £5 is a drop in the ocean at this time, my concern is that there has been much marketing and launching of the service that LitDrive provides as free and as such charging goes against the plethora of marketing and promotions that saw the unprecedented growth of the service in the first place.

If the core value of charging can change from being free in a matter of months to a nominal fee, there is no reason that I can see for the nominal fee being increased over time and becoming a much more expensive charge. If teachers choose to contribute voluntarily that is up to them, but charging means that an exclusivity is being created meaning that many teachers will be unable to access the resources that hundreds of teachers would have previously happily shared without asking for a penny. 

Furthermore, there is a concern over their* resources being wholly belonging to individuals. If I take an idea from something I have seen on Twitter or on a Facebook forum and adapt it, does it truly belong to me? Or, should I consider it the intellectual property of the original source? For this reason, I don’t believe I should be allowing a charge to happen for resources that don’t wholly belong to me or that have been inspired by others thought processes. 
Another thought would be whether I should allow profit to be gained from resources that I produce in the course of my job, which I am already paid for. If I sell resources or allow a hosting site to charge for the access to these resources, then is this a form of deceit? I have already been paid to produce these resources. 

As well as this, there is the moral conundrum, I feel that teachers should be pulling each other up and supporting each other in the already difficult conditions that we work and by creating another paid for site to share resources, this is creating another way of not supporting each other, but instead creating a division between those who use and can access Lit Drive and those who don’t and can’t or won’t. 

The blog post that I, along with several members of Team English shared https://susansenglish.wordpress.com/2019/05/05/why-i-love-tes-education-resources-an-open-expression-of-concern outlines concerns about paid for resources and I see little difference in the TES charging and LitDrive charging. 

The #teamenglish ethos of sharing appeals to my sense of collaboration, helping and supporting other teachers and while I understand that LitDrive will be non-profit, there will be an element of profit and someone will be paid a charity wage to run the organisation, therefore someone will be profiting from the hard work of hundreds of teachers. 

Therefore, for the above reasons I will be withdrawing as a Regional Adviser and would like my resources to be taken off the site and my membership closed.

I’m happy to discuss further, but this hasn’t been an easy decision to make and fundamentally it goes against my own principles but does not mean that others need to feel the same way. 

Regards, 

Susan Strachan @SusanSEnglish